Monday, February 09, 2009

Charlie Brooker on Twitter


Here's what he has to say, and it's quite good as usual. The screengrab would suggest that he hasn't quite grasped the two-way nature of the whole thing tho...

3 comments:

Scribbles said...

i'm still not over learning about "docking" ... i am too innocent for this world.

Paulie said...

It's a new one on me as well. Thing is, when you think about it, it's actually not possible.

I think he was making it up.

When the ... er ... *oul lad* stands to attention ... er ... so to speak... the foreskin tends to lose any slack that it had. So, docking would seem to be based on the idea that the two ... er.... *mickeys* are flacid.

Where's the fun in that?

And - not being gay - I can still understand why some of the things that I understand gay people get up to (am I being quite coy enough here?) can be fun, I really can't imagine that 'docking' would give any pleasure of any kind to anyone.

If any of my gay readers would like to comment on this, please feel free to set me straight.

Er ... let me rephrase that....

Will said...

http://ruletheweb.co.uk/b3ta/bus/?s1=A+PRIEST+IS+DOCKING+YOUR+CHILD&s2=IN+CHURCH&s3=RIGHT+NOW