Anyway, apropos of not much, I found a good refresher essay here. And this factoid leaped out:
...in modern armies the soldier does not own his weapons, whereas in ancient armies he did . For example, in ancient Rome when the army was called together the 'classes' were expected to come equipped to a certain standard at their own expense - 'classification' was a form of taxation. Soldiers were expected to bring money to buy food from the locals (when they did not take what they wanted by force); they got no pay or provisions.
4 comments:
James Buchanan for public choice theory. It's what he got his Nobel for after all.
He wouldn't have got it if I was giving them out Tim ;-)
Regarding the factoid, 'modern' armies includes the Roman army after the Marian reforms of 107 BC.
Is the Roman army description not the context of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution?
Post a Comment